‘Without Remorse’: Read the book instead
With the arrival of recent action films in the past decade, such as the “John Wick” series and “The Raid” duology, it has become evident that action films need a gimmick or standout feature to be successful.
The factors could include intricate stunt choreography, an enthralling lead performance or a compelling story where the action feels fitting rather than misplaced or random. When one thinks of the films based on the novels of Tom Clancy, viewers can expect political intrigue blended with high-octane thrills or action.
Released on Amazon Prime Video on April 30 “Without Remorse” is the latest Tom Clancy film adaptation since “Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit” (2014). Loosely based on the novel of the same name, “Without Remorse” integrates itself into the continuity established by Amazon’s “Jack Ryan” TV series and acts as a re-introduction to the John Clark character, portrayed by Willem Dafoe and Liev Schreiber in previous films. While the film seems like the perfect setup for a Clancy cinematic universe, it makes the mistake of making itself into a generic and predictable action thriller that carries a muddled plotline.
The film follows Navy SEAL John Kelly (Michael B. Jordan) after he returns to the U.S. after leading a covert mission in Syria that could cause an international conflict. As retaliation for his role in the mission, Kelly and his team are targeted at their U.S. homes by Russian operatives. In the attack against Kelly, his pregnant wife (Lauren London) is killed and he is left for dead. Motivated by revenge, Kelly embarks on a violent mission to find his wife’s killer and uncover the conspiracy that could result in an all-out war between the U.S. and Russia.
The film carries a conventional revenge narrative that does not feel exciting or innovative. While viewers can easily predict the murder of Kelly’s wife, the flaw is that there is no emotional weight to her death as we only see her for a few minutes; she is simply there to motivate the plot. The plot feels very bland as it never actually delves into character development and fails to make sense of the events that take place in its runtime.
Rather than slowly building tension, the film just incorporates non-believable action sequences for the sake of keeping attention; however, the placement of these sequences wastes time that could have easily been used towards character moments or plot details. Even then, the narrative just is not compelling and does not carry the intrigue that could be found in earlier Tom Clancy films, particularly because the film only shares the title and a small number of characters with the original novel.
It can be said that the main draw of the film is Michael B. Jordan, but he is not given the chance to explore the different sides of Kelly from the novel. Jordan portrays Kelly as a brutal and resourceful action hero, almost in the vein of Jason Bourne, but he still comes off as being one-dimensional for the majority of the film due to lack of character development and no chance to actually connect with him. The supporting cast, consisting of Jamie Bell, Jodie Turner-Smith, and Guy Pearce are good performers but their characters are quite forgettable; the characters appear like they are simply there as a fan service to those who have read the Clancy novels.
The action sequences are unrealistic and do not feel logical in how they are supposed to relate to the plot. Given how the trailers for the film highlight some of the bigger action sequences, it can be seen how these sequences lose their intensity and do not feel as weighty at all in the context of the film; in other words, the action is just there to appeal to mass audiences. Additionally, it never feels like the film utilizes the R-rating to its advantage; the action sequences are nearly bloodless, there is no weight to the fight or shootout scenes and the plot becomes obvious in the third act. Again, this is another deviation from the original novel, which has been praised for its dark, grounded and gritty action.
“Without Remorse” is a film that fails to set itself apart from other action films as it tells a conventional revenge story that doesn’t utilize its cast or action to the best of its ability. For Clancy fans, this is a disappointing adaptation that fails to showcase the nuance and strength in the John Clark character. Unremorsefully, viewers can find a unique story in the original novel rather than settling for the genericness of its adaptation.
Rg Ritter • Aug 14, 2021 at 8:54 am
Honestly I have nothing good to say about the plot. It was so different from the novel that it’s not recognizable.
I suspect that they will rewrite the plot for the Rainbow Six novel and it will also be horrid.
Sad commentary to the legacy of John Clark and Tom Clancy.
John Browning • Aug 6, 2021 at 6:31 am
I’m about halfway through the movie at this point, and honestly it’s not a bad movie. But the fact that they used Tom Clancy‘s book’s title and then created a movie that was hardly similar, it’s just so wrong.
Imagine if a movie came out called Dracula, and then it turned to be a vampire movie about a vampire who lived in California, not Transilvania, in the present day, not the 1800s, etc. I’m sure you get what I mean.
Lastly, I really wish I knew how to fit 15 or more bullets into a single stack model of 1911 the way the main character of this movie did in the shoot out senior at the beginning of the movie. #CrackheadHollywoodAtItsWorst
John Browning • Aug 6, 2021 at 5:21 am
Though my first comment will probably be moderated, due to its graphic nature, though it’s graphic nature was totally warranted, here’s the G rated version: if Tom Clancy were alive today, he would sue the living daylights out of these imbeciles that took his title and created a mediocre, Waste of time movie that had almost nothing to do with his original book.
John Browning • Aug 6, 2021 at 5:16 am
If Tom Clancy were alive he would sue the fuck out of these assholes that made this movie.
Rodgerv • Jul 9, 2021 at 5:03 pm
I was completely disappointed to. I had to search out this type of forum to make sure it just wasn’t me. The movie is completely unlike the book which I found quite good. The only two things the same are that he fakes being drunk and fakes his death. The book details a complex plan to rescue an American from a Vietnam war camp. The movie is all about a conflict with Russia. If Tom Clancy were alive I doubt he would have approved the script.
George A Hamilton Jr • Jul 6, 2021 at 12:47 pm
I guess that it would have been an acceptable “suspend all disbelief” action movie if the title didn’t lead you to think it had anything, other that a few names, to do with Tom Clancy’s book which I just re-read. By the way, two separate references in the book tell you that Kelly/Clark is white so the entire racial aspect has nothing to do with the book.
Mike Quinnn • Jul 6, 2021 at 12:05 am
As a huge Clancy fan I’m insulted. Very disappointed by this film adaptation. I lost interest in the opening sequence but to be fair I watched the whole thing.
Tom • Jul 5, 2021 at 12:36 am
This movie has NOTHING to do with Clancy’s book (story) WITHOUT REMORSE. I was expecting a movie/story abased off the original novel. This movie did not follow the book — it was just another action flick that hijacked Clancy’s book title and main character to make a C-Level movie. What a waste.